1.0 approaches

Mathieu Clabaut mathieu.clabaut at gmail.com
Fri Mar 7 03:04:09 CST 2008


On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Simon Cusack <scusack at fastmail.com.au>
wrote:

> On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:07:07 +0100
> "Mathieu Clabaut" <mathieu.clabaut at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 06:36:29PM -0500, Leo Razoumov wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am drooling in excitement:-)  That magic "approximately a
> > > > month" is about to elapse any time now.
> > >
> > > It's now looking more like a week, put off largely by my laptop
> > > dying. Let's call it next Friday.
>
> > http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue438will
>
> Just my 2 cents but http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue995 is a....

+1.

Does a consolidated lists of issues that are considered as "must be fixed
before 1.0" exist somewhere  ?
I have no much free time planned for the next days, but if such a list exist
I may take some chunks of spare time to have look at the issues in it
(considering mercurial is one of my favorite every day used tool)...

-mathieu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20080307/a4bda137/attachment.htm 


More information about the Mercurial mailing list