Slime project considering Mercurial

[Peter Arrenbrecht]

On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:
>
>  On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 14:23 +0100, Patrick Mézard wrote:
>  > Giorgos Keramidas a écrit :
>  > > On 2008-03-07 08:06, Peter Arrenbrecht <peter.arrenbrecht at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > >> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 5:28 AM, Paul Franz <theandromedan at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > > In newer versions of Mercurial, you can also do this without the extra
>  > > 'empty' workspace, by using the --all option of `hg bundle':
>  > >
>  > >     % cd /ws/foo-project/releases/1.0-patches
>  > >     % hg bundle --all /var/tmp/wiredata.bundle
>  >
>  > Or use the little obscure but available for a long time:
>  >
>  > % hg bundle --base null /var/tmp/wiredata.bundle
>
>  For the record, the preferred file extension for a bundle is ".hg".

Heh. Fancy that. It's what I normally use, but then someone else said
he uses repo.hg to mark repos, not bundles. So I thought I'd look for
something else. What about .hgq for queue bundles (bundles of
.hg/patches repos)?
-peo