1.0 approaches

Matt Mackall mpm at selenic.com
Sun Mar 9 19:28:47 CDT 2008


On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 10:04 +0100, Mathieu Clabaut wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Simon Cusack
> <scusack at fastmail.com.au> wrote:
>         On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:07:07 +0100
>         "Mathieu Clabaut" <mathieu.clabaut at gmail.com> wrote:
>         
>         > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Matt Mackall
>         <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:
>         >
>         > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 06:36:29PM -0500, Leo Razoumov
>         wrote:
>         > >
>         > > > I am drooling in excitement:-)  That magic
>         "approximately a
>         > > > month" is about to elapse any time now.
>         > >
>         > > It's now looking more like a week, put off largely by my
>         laptop
>         > > dying. Let's call it next Friday.
>         
>         
>         > http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue438will 
>         
>         
>         Just my 2 cents but
>         http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue995 is a....
> +1.
> 
> Does a consolidated lists of issues that are considered as "must be
> fixed before 1.0" exist somewhere  ?

The list is basically "anything that broke since 0.9.5" because "0.9.5
and a couple releases before it were good enough to be called 1.0".
We've already spent too much time polishing, it's time to declare it
ready to use.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.



More information about the Mercurial mailing list