pmezard at gmail.com
Wed Mar 12 15:09:00 CDT 2008
Matt Mackall a écrit :
> On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 13:49 +0100, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:
>> Looks like it's just about time to cut a 1.0 release. I think
>> we've been
>> at a reasonable 1.0-level of features and stability for a
>> while now, and
>> we probably could have named the 0.9.5 release "1.0" so
>> there's no point
>> in putting it off.
>> I think it would be nice if mercurial would be installable with
>> The current version c7253d1a774e from http://selenic.com/repo/hg/ is
> That looks fine to me, but I worry it might break on Windows.
"hg version" still works on WinXP when installing patched sources.
How am I supposed to test it is easy installable on Windows ?
More information about the Mercurial