immutable commit messages, why?

Peter Arrenbrecht peter.arrenbrecht at gmail.com
Thu Mar 20 08:12:05 CDT 2008


On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Will Maier <willmaier at ml1.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:30:27AM +0100, Martin Geisler wrote:
>  > Put that way, then I agree with you. Currently you cannot do a commit if
>  > nothing has changed, but if that was allowed, then I could imagine that
>  > empty commits would be a way to amend the commit messages:
>  >
>  >   hg status
>  >   M foo.c
>  >   hg commit -m 'Fixed bug.'          # Bad commit message.
>  >   hg commit -f -m 'Fixed bug 123.'   # Better message.
>
>  Is there some reason rollback or mq aren't applicable here?

I thought one could do this much later by updating to the rev with the
bad msg, committing a better msg, then merging. Though I think it
might be hard for the log viewer to associate the new message with the
old commit in this scenario.
-peo


More information about the Mercurial mailing list