-A vs. -a -b in base64-encoded attachments
peter.kourzanov at xs4all.nl
Fri Mar 21 06:24:21 CDT 2008
Thomas, et al.,
I would like to avoid having to specify too many options:
$hg email -d -A -r is already a sign of creeping featuritis...
In any case this ($hg email -b -d -A -r...) would be too verbose
to my taste. What's so terribly wrong with having -A and --Attach
mean something else that -a and --attach? We do have already -i
vs. -a, so wht can't we just add another variation to it?
P.S. Please CC to personal address as I am not subscribed
More information about the Mercurial