-A vs. -a -b in base64-encoded attachments
bboissin at gmail.com
Fri Mar 21 06:35:31 CDT 2008
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Pjotr Kourzanov
<peter.kourzanov at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Thomas, et al.,
> I would like to avoid having to specify too many options:
> $hg email -d -A -r is already a sign of creeping featuritis...
> In any case this ($hg email -b -d -A -r...) would be too verbose
> to my taste. What's so terribly wrong with having -A and --Attach
> mean something else that -a and --attach? We do have already -i
> vs. -a, so wht can't we just add another variation to it?
If you use an option often, you can add a config option too
(email.base64 = True ?)
More information about the Mercurial