Why backout, not revert?
alpar at cs.elte.hu
Tue Mar 25 08:22:55 CDT 2008
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:37 +0100, Marcin Kasperski wrote:
> Are there any noticeable advantages of using backout instead of revert?
> (by using revert I mean
> hg revert -r BeforeIStartedThisBadIdea
> hg commit -m "Giving up the flawed concept"
Backout seems to be equivalent with
hg update -C BadCommit
hg revert -r ParentOfBadCommit
Personally I think that backout is of little use. Hopefully it is used
very rarely in practice, thus it isn't really a problem to do it
manually. Moreover, it does not allow reverting more than one
(consecutive) commits at once, which might also be necessary sometimes.
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
More information about the Mercurial