Superfluous(?) "push -f" warning
kai.grossjohann at verizonbusiness.com
Tue Mar 25 11:45:06 CDT 2008
Say I have a named branch "unstable" and the default branch is for the
stable release. Say further that those developing on the unstable
branch do "hg merge -r default" often.
Then after they do "hg merge -r default" the default branch loses its
head and this means that I can't push changes on the default branch
without using "-f".
But I think if a named branch is headless, then it is not wrong for
pushing to add a head to this branch.
What do people think?
More information about the Mercurial