Question about named branches
benoit at aeteurope.nl
Fri Mar 28 05:21:29 CDT 2008
> Then when after I've pulled in the work from developer A to try it out,
> I continue to work on my own branch with more commits. When I want to
> push my changes to my (personal) remote repository it fails because it
> would create multiple heads. I can fix this by giving a revisition to
> push , but then I first have to do "hg id" to find the revision.
> Is there any way to get hg push to only push changes that are on my branch?
You can use the branchname as a revision , it will mean the same thing
as the most recent revision on that branch
hg push -r branchname
should do the trick
> : speaking of pushing revision, will it include all missing dependent
> changesets when pushing, or only the one I'm giving as an argument?
The one you gave as argument and its ancestors if not present on the
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4258 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20080328/909e385d/attachment.bin
More information about the Mercurial