Question about named branches
trygvis at inamo.no
Fri Mar 28 05:26:17 CDT 2008
Benoît Allard skrev:
>> Then when after I've pulled in the work from developer A to try it
>> out, I continue to work on my own branch with more commits. When I
>> want to push my changes to my (personal) remote repository it fails
>> because it would create multiple heads. I can fix this by giving a
>> revisition to push , but then I first have to do "hg id" to find
>> the revision.
>> Is there any way to get hg push to only push changes that are on my
> You can use the branchname as a revision , it will mean the same thing
> as the most recent revision on that branch
> hg push -r branchname
> should do the trick
Ah, great. This make this whole thing a bit easier for us.
>> : speaking of pushing revision, will it include all missing
>> dependent changesets when pushing, or only the one I'm giving as an
> The one you gave as argument and its ancestors if not present on the
> other repo
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
More information about the Mercurial