size of repository with many branches, vs. git
Patrick Mézard
pmezard at gmail.com
Sun Mar 30 16:25:42 CDT 2008
Dov Feldstern a écrit :
>
> Matt Mackall wrote:
>> On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 22:03 +0200, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
>
>>> Does tracking the branches in separate clones help ?
>> The quick way to answer this question is to do a clone -r of the two
>> branches and sum up their sizes.
>>
>
> Oh, wait, I should have stated this explicitly earlier: there are not 2,
> but about -25- branches in the repository. At any given time, at least 2
> are active, but all-in-all there are about 25...
>
> I'll try to convert (from my local mercurial -> mercurial) with
> hg.clonebranches=1, that should test exactly what we want to, shouldn't it?
Try cloning the branch themselves, clonebranches=1 will do the same thing but will be much slower.
--
Patrick Mézard
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list