size of repository with many branches, vs. git
bboissin at gmail.com
Sun Mar 30 20:46:26 CDT 2008
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 02:01:35AM +0200, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 06:12:36PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > I tried sorting the revs to be linear and do a delta vs tip:
> > And here again. You've optimized the revision order and then did only
> > deltas?
> I hacked it into changegroupsubset and did a clone --pull -r tip:
> 271M 2008-03-28 19:51 .hg/store/00manifest.d
> 5.4M 2008-03-28 19:51 .hg/store/00manifest.i
> 134M 2008-03-31 01:44 .hg/store/00manifest.d
> 5.4M 2008-03-31 01:44 .hg/store/00manifest.i
Some more results: the tarfile of .hg/store goes from 510M down to 372M
Maybe it is worth doing this optimization to the repo in kernel.org.
More information about the Mercurial