More SVN->HG questions

Stephen Rasku mercurial at srasku.net
Thu Jul 9 11:09:35 CDT 2009


On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 03:25, Jeff Squyres<jsquyres at cisco.com> wrote:
> Many thanks for all the replies to my first question.  We'll take this
> all back and talk amongst ourselves about it.
>
> Does anyone have any advice on the 2nd question, perchance?
>
>>
>> How to other projects typically handle this kind of scenario?  Do your
>> developers use the rebase extension, or mq?  Or do you do something
>> else?

We are using rebase when the developers remember to do it.  If they
forget then they have to do a merge.  I like rebase because it doesn't
"pollute" the history with extraneous merge messages.  We are not,
however, compressing multiple developer checkins down to a single
changeset.

...Stephen



More information about the Mercurial mailing list