More SVN->HG questions
Stephen Rasku
mercurial at srasku.net
Thu Jul 9 11:09:35 CDT 2009
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 03:25, Jeff Squyres<jsquyres at cisco.com> wrote:
> Many thanks for all the replies to my first question. We'll take this
> all back and talk amongst ourselves about it.
>
> Does anyone have any advice on the 2nd question, perchance?
>
>>
>> How to other projects typically handle this kind of scenario? Do your
>> developers use the rebase extension, or mq? Or do you do something
>> else?
We are using rebase when the developers remember to do it. If they
forget then they have to do a merge. I like rebase because it doesn't
"pollute" the history with extraneous merge messages. We are not,
however, compressing multiple developer checkins down to a single
changeset.
...Stephen
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list