On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 16:57, Jon Ribbens <jon-mercurial at unequivocal.co.uk> wrote: > No, you're not getting it, despite me explaining it several times. > The scenario we were investigating was that the rollback *did* > lose a respository that was not a fresh clone. Okay, can you demonstrate that using a transcript? Cheers, Dirkjan