Using mercurial while keeping uncomitted changes

Aardwolf toiletpot at
Fri Apr 9 14:13:19 CDT 2010

Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 19:03, Aardwolf <toiletpot at> wrote:
>> How can I get the "wanted" situation in the image without having to
>> commit
>> my uncommitted local changes, or in the least painful way?
> Pull before you commit twelve. Commit twelve by specifying files with
> commit or using the record extension. Then push.
> Cheers,
> Dirkjan
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at


Normally I do pull before I commit & push exactly to avoid this situation.
But just today it happened that EXACTLY during the minute between I updated
and pushed, someone did a commit in between! And even though his commit/push
was related to a file totally unrelated to my files, everything was

So is there anything to cope better with this situation?
View this message in context:
Sent from the Mercurial mailing list archive at

More information about the Mercurial mailing list