Using mercurial while keeping uncomitted changes
toiletpot at gmail.com
Fri Apr 9 14:13:19 CDT 2010
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 19:03, Aardwolf <toiletpot at gmail.com> wrote:
>> How can I get the "wanted" situation in the image without having to
>> my uncommitted local changes, or in the least painful way?
> Pull before you commit twelve. Commit twelve by specifying files with
> commit or using the record extension. Then push.
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
Normally I do pull before I commit & push exactly to avoid this situation.
But just today it happened that EXACTLY during the minute between I updated
and pushed, someone did a commit in between! And even though his commit/push
was related to a file totally unrelated to my files, everything was
So is there anything to cope better with this situation?
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Using-mercurial-while-keeping-uncomitted-changes-tp28194972p28196392.html
Sent from the Mercurial mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Mercurial