hg equivalent of git stash

[Matt Mackall]

On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 01:09 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Brendan Cully <brendan at kublai.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 09:46, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > > This isn't a beautiful user experience, but it should work.
> > >
> > > This ugliness is the reason people have written the shelve and attic
> > > extensions.
> >
> > By the way, I think another reason this is as ugly as it is, is that
> > shelve/stash is probably mostly used by new converts from
> > CVS/svn. Once you get into mq, it feels much better to keep your code
> > always in an mq patch rather than leaving it unprotected in the
> > working directory. So experienced users don't spend much time on the
> > qref/qpop -f bits of the process.
> >
> 
> I think you are wrong in both cases. Despite my vast experience with SVN,
> CVS and cvs2svn, this post was inspired by git user, who showed me how do
> they live without MQ. I am using queues for more than 6 months for sure,
> but I am not as enthusiastic as you with them for several reasons: 1. I
> still can not get enough time to learn them completely. 2. I can't
> reorder/edit them without using editor to mess with .hg/patches.

hg qpush --move

>  3. Many
> commands, but hard to do basic things - I still don't know if it is
> possible to edit commit message with my editor after the patch is created,
> or set it when finalizing MQ.

hg qref -e

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.