hg equivalent of git stash

Paul Boddie paul.boddie at biotek.uio.no
Tue Dec 13 05:55:50 CST 2011


On 12/12/11 22:32, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>
> Yes. Not as beautiful as Matt's ad promised. =) You also need to type in
> your patch name in the last command, so it becomes much harder to be
> automated.

I don't really know why Matt made that "ad". Every query about using mq 
I can recall him responding to has elicited the advice to try something 
simpler first. Maybe he knows that you like a challenge. ;-)

[...]

> At least we now all agree that this is ugly and user experience is pretty
> bad compared to Git. The question is if you are going to fix that?

I'm not sure that it is a bad user experience if you just use the other 
extensions. Maybe mq makes more sense if you're used to stuff like 
quilt, with which I've had some recent, brief experiences and which 
looks quite similar superficially.

Paul


More information about the Mercurial mailing list