CVS -> HG convert - large repos....
Peter Toft
pto at linuxbog.dk
Tue Jan 4 08:58:12 CST 2011
Hi All
I have been experimenting quite a bit converting CVS repositories to
Mercurial.
With "minor/young" CVS repositories I find that "hg convert
CVS_sandbox HG_sandbox"
does the job well. Quite fast and painless.
However for a big old CVS repository with ~2000 files - all in all ~90
MB. I have approx
30000 commits over the time, then the pain starts to kick in :)
I find that "hg convert" spins fine in the start, but seems to go
exponentially down in speed
over the time. I have after 24 hours still 12000 commits left for
processing and only a few
commits are processed every hour just now. I see the CVS subprocess
running 100% on one CPU.
Anyone seen that "getting reaaaaaaaaly slow"-behavour before?
I have been around http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki and other places
for documentation -
as well as http://hgbook.red-bean.com/read/migrating-to-mercurial.html
+
http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/FAQ
I have then also been looking into cvs2hg (from cvs2svn), tailor, and
cvs20hg - but it seems
that they are aging. They do not seem to be easy ways forward with a
modern Linux-distribution
e.g. Ubuntu 10.10.
Anyone else with experiences with BIG cvs repos?
It is smarter to convert CVS->SVN->HG as some have proposed?
Best
--
Peter Toft <pto at linuxbog.dk> http://petertoft.dk
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list