Pull behaviour using branches with bookmarks

Alexander Schatten ml_alexanderschatten at gmx.at
Fri Jan 28 06:14:30 CST 2011


Sorry, but not other comments? Should I file an bug-isse somewhere?


cheers


Alex

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:21:52 +0100
> Von: "Alexander Schatten" <ml_alexanderschatten at gmx.at>
> An: mercurial at selenic.com
> Betreff: Re: Pull behaviour using branches with bookmarks

> > 
> > By branch, I think you mean bookmark (there is no named feature branch 
> > or named clone called feature in your example). 
> 
> No, by branch I actually mean branch. It is not a named branch, that is
> true, but a branch nonetheless. Bookmarking is one way of "tagging" or
> "naming" or "managing" branches, as I understand it.
> 
> 
> > 
> > I agree this looks like a bug - moving the feature bookmark in cases (2)
> > and (3) is wrong, and in case (2) I think the main bookmark should be 
> > moved as well as in case (3).
> > 
> 
> 
> Exactly, in my opinion the behaviour is not correct.
> 
> 
> 
> cheers
> 
> 
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial


More information about the Mercurial mailing list