Mercurial usage

Dave Brosius dbrosius at
Sat Jun 11 06:58:29 CDT 2011

On 06/11/2011 07:31 AM, norricorp wrote:
> Hi Na'Tosha,
> thanks for this.  What about the situation where developer pulls latest from
> central to local, merges, tests and before he pushes back, another developer
> has pushed back.
> Presumably one wants to avoid a situation where there are several heads in
> the central repos.

The nice thing is that when this situation occurs, Mercurial doesn't 
allow you to push by default. The developer needs to pull/merge/commit 
again, and then try to push.

The benefit of this is, the person who is stuck doing the merge (when 
painful --rarely) is the one who understands what the changes are. This 
is way better then having a 'central repo maintainer' who's job it is to 
manage the pushes to the central repo. That poor guy has no idea how to 
resolve merges since it's not his code changes.

I'd highly recommend against a central repo czar in the corporate 

More information about the Mercurial mailing list