Mercurial Workflow: Feature seperation via named branches

[Pierre-Yves David]

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 04:57:29PM +0200, Martin Geisler wrote:

> >> By the way, maybe we should begin using some bookmarks in Mercurial
> >> itself: Henrik and I could push the patches for abandoned changesets
> >> as a branch with a bookmark and you and others could give much better
> >> and faster feedback in the form of commits instead of just chatting
> >> here.
> >
> > Hmmm, that'll change everyone's workflow against crew. I'd rather do
> > this experiment in another repo.
> 
> I agree with you -- the crew repository is not the best place to start
> this experiment.
> 
> We could start it outside of crew if we agree that it is okay to
> pull+merge the resulting repository back into crew at some point instead
> of rebasing the changesets.

I don't see pull+merge he resulting repository in crew as a good idea.

-- 
Pierre-Yves David

http://www.logilab.fr/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20110617/f3afdd11/attachment.pgp>