Request for rebaseif extension to be provided by default with rebase
arne_bab at web.de
Fri Jun 17 16:30:02 CDT 2011
On Friday 17 June 2011 15:45:55 Sébastien Deleuze wrote:
> I think this email fit in the current topic because I would like to emphasis
> the fact that, even at first time rebaseif seems just a tiny exception with
> a strange name, it is a major need for most users.
I have to support that. I got exactly that complaint from two users: Why do I
need two commands?
What I’d prefer would be to have the extension checking if it can rebase or
merge without conflicts, and if it can’t, tell the user that it got a new head
which requires manual merging.
Essentially it is a merge/rebase with a safety net and no ui clutter (anything
which would require user interaction is avoided).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the Mercurial