hg fold is not intuitive
anatoly techtonik
techtonik at gmail.com
Thu Nov 21 09:59:40 CST 2013
I've got quite unexpected result from 'hg fold'. It looks too low level
and/or incomplete. I had this:
@ changeset: 189:43185a19a6fe
|
o changeset: 188:09ff01b1d972
|
o changeset: 187:56687f8dd2d5
|
o changeset: 186:bce73b522aba
|
o changeset: 185:bc342dc49d41
And wanted to make single revision out of 186:188:
> hg fold -r 186:188
I got this:
o changeset: 190:59975fb696ec
| tag: tip
| parent: 185:bc342dc49d41
|
| @ changeset: 189:43185a19a6fe
| |
| x changeset: 188:09ff01b1d972
| |
| x changeset: 187:56687f8dd2d5
| |
| x changeset: 186:bce73b522aba
|/
|
Which is not what I expected - 2 heads.
@ changeset: 189:43185a19a6fe
|
o changeset: 188:09ff01b1d972
|
o changeset: 187:56687f8dd2d5
|
o changeset: 186:bce73b522aba
|
o changeset: 185:bc342dc49d41
I really hoped to see 1 head after this command.
Something like:
o changeset: 189:43185a19a6fe
|
o changeset: 190:59975fb696ec
| tag: tip
| parent: 185:bc342dc49d41
|
|
|\
| x changeset: 188:09ff01b1d972
| |
| x changeset: 187:56687f8dd2d5
| |
| x changeset: 186:bce73b522aba
|/
|
Is that possible?
In any case what should I do now to get it?
Why users are required to do this?
--
anatoly t.
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list