Other Languages: Zh
There are three standard ways of managing branches that you no longer plan on working with. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages and should be selected on what best fits how you work with your repository.
1. Closing branches
A branch may be closed by running the following commands:
hg up -C badbranch hg commit --close-branch -m 'close badbranch, this approach never worked' hg up -C default
This creates a closing changeset which typically contains no modifications to tracked files. Closing changesets can be identified by close=1 in the changeset's extra field.
Once a branch is closed it will display the closed state in hg branches. A closed branch is not considered active and will not be displayed by default.
% hg branches default 12:d52ed2ac9127 % hg branches --closed default 12:d52ed2ac9127 badbranch 11:cd3e11a024bf (closed)
In addition hg heads (see Head) now accepts the --closed option.
2. No-Op Merges
Another way is to do a "no-op merge" to remove the branch:
$ hg update -C tip # jump to one head $ hg merge otherhead # merge in the other head $ hg revert -a -r tip # undo all the changes from the merge $ hg commit -m "eliminate other head" # create new tip identical to the old
2.1. Why this might be bad
The new merged head is based on the "eliminated" head, so it is not really eliminated. Furthermore, it is now incorporated into the main line, which actually may even be worse than simply letting that dead head alone.
Consider you have a clone of a project like Mercurial – let's say a clone of the crew repository – and you do make a change C1 based on some changeset P from the crew repo and propose that to the crew members for inclusion into the project.
If your change C1 is rejected or rebased on inclusion, you now have a dead branch C1 in your repo. If you merge that in your repo, you just create yet another line of development that is divergent from crew. So, in this case, merging your dead head doesn't make anything better as any new change you commit to your merged head won't be accepted for inclusion into crew anymore, since that would mean pulling-in your "eliminated" head as well. Such a new change would be said to not be "clean".
3. Using clone
The recommended procedure to really eliminate unwanted heads is to use hg clone --rev. First, you rename your current repo to a backup. Then you clone the backup back to the original name, but you specify --rev X where X is the parent of the first of the chain of wanted changesets. If your repository has other heads you need to preserve, specify them too, as additional --rev Y arguments. For example:
hg clone backup repo --rev X --rev Y
When you've cloned, verify that
hg incoming -R repo backup
really only shows the changesets you wanted to drop. If you discover changesets you do need, after all (for instance, another head you forgot to specify above), you can pull them over using
hg pull -R repo backup --rev Y
Repeat until you're satisfied with the pruned repo.
Copy over all non-tracked files you might want to preserve. In particular, you might want to copy .hg/hgrc from the backup since your default path now points to the backup instead of the original clone source.
You can remove your backup repository now.
4. Using strip
Another option may be to strip your dead branch with hg strip, a command which is provided by the StripExtension:
hg strip [-f] [-b] [-n] REV strip a revision and all later revs on the same branch options: -b --backup bundle unrelated changesets -n --nobackup no backups
However, note that this is a non-history-preserving transformation of your repository. If anyone else has already pulled your C1 and used that as a parent for more changes, you might get that back if you pull from that person (The "Genie is out of the Bottle" problem, see also EditingHistory).