Differences between revisions 27 and 28
Revision 27 as of 2013-08-26 15:45:59
Size: 2656
Editor: alex hunsley
Comment: Vandalism
Revision 28 as of 2013-08-27 01:42:49
Size: 409
Editor: KandiLest
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
= Mercurial Working Practices =

This page documents some ways to use Mercurial. Because the software is flexible, there's no "right way", but some methods are more scalable than others. These are a few tips for creating a scaleable workflow.

First, [[Merge|merge]] often! This makes merging easier for everyone and you
find out about conflicts (which are often rooted in incompatible
design decisions) earlier.

Second, don't hesitate to use multiple trees locally. Mercurial makes
this fast and light-weight. Typical usage is to have an incoming tree,
an outgoing tree, and a separate tree for each area being worked on.

{{{#!dot
digraph G {
  upstream;
  subgraph {
    incoming; outgoing;
    rank=same
  }
  working;
  upstream -> incoming [label="pull"];
  incoming -> working [label="pull"];
  working -> working [label="update/merge"];
  working -> outgoing [label="push"];
  outgoing -> upstream [label="push or publish"];
}
}}}

The incoming tree is best maintained as a pristine copy of the
upstream [[Repository|repository]]. This works as a cache so that you don't have to
[[Pull|pull]] multiple copies over the network. No need to check files out here
as you won't be changing them.

The outgoing tree contains all the changes you intend for merge into
upstream. Publish this tree with `hg serve` or [[PublishingRepositories|hgweb]] or use
`hg push` to [[Push|push]] it to another publicly available repository.

Then, for each feature you work on, create a new tree. Commit early
and commit often, merge with incoming regularly, and once you're
satisfied with your feature, pull the changes into your outgoing tree.

== Other ways to collaborate ==

|| '''Name''' || '''Scalability''' || '''Overhead''' || '''Description''' ||
|| CvsLikePractice || poor || low || keep things simple, use a few central repositories ||
|| KernelPractice || good || medium || distributed, semi-hierarchical development ||
|| ControlledPractice || good || medium || hierarchical development ||

[[ContributingChanges|Mercurial development practices]] resemble those described in KernelPractice.

== Backup practices ==

To maintain a backup of commits, you can clone a repository and push your changes to it periodically.

== See also ==

 * How to write good [[ChangeSetComments|changeset comments]]
 * The [[RepositoryNaming|naming of repositories]] is important, because you'll probably have lots of them
 * Dealing with contributions from [[MultipleCommitters|multiple committers]]
 * More [[Workflows]] with usecase and requirements

----
CategoryHowTo
Ernest is his name and believes it sounds often good. Some period of time ago he chose to stay in Idaho.<<BR>>
What he really enjoys doing is jumping in but he's been running into new things lately. The job he's been occupying for a few years is a procurement police but his promotion you should not comes. Go to his website to find outside more: http://www.impedanceanalyzer.com.au/news_feed.php?itemid=16

Ernest is his name and believes it sounds often good. Some period of time ago he chose to stay in Idaho.
What he really enjoys doing is jumping in but he's been running into new things lately. The job he's been occupying for a few years is a procurement police but his promotion you should not comes. Go to his website to find outside more: http://www.impedanceanalyzer.com.au/news_feed.php?itemid=16

WorkingPractices (last edited 2013-08-31 09:38:15 by rcl)